My 99 Cents


Separated at Birth?
April 29, 2007, 3:12 am
Filed under: culture, movies

Is it me or is Leo DiCaprio looking more and more like Clark Gable these days?

DiCaprio has the outsized swagger and glamour of Old Hollywood. Maybe it’s unfortunate that he’s so “big.” He’s ambitious as an actor, but looking at The Departed or Blood Diamond, his aura overwhelms the character he’s playing. Plus the movies themselves are terrible, but that’s a different story.

leod.jpg

clark-gable.jpg



The Bad Old Days
April 24, 2007, 6:29 am
Filed under: culture

Growing up in New England, Aunt Jemima and Uncle Ben were characters from a place and time I didn’t think or know much about – namely, the “Old (pre-war) South.”

Racist character stereotypes in advertising were not limited to Southern imagery however; I’m old enough to remember packets of “Injun Orange” juice drink mix, and The Frito Bandito was familiar too.

Don’t miss this incredible slide-show by David Segal at Slate
It traces the history and context of various, and often virulent, racist language and imagery in American advertizing.

Here is Segal on the origins of Aunt Jemima:

Looking for a way to sell a self-rising pancake mix, Chris L. Rutt conceived a jolly ex-slave who lived on a Louisiana plantation and made legendary flapjacks in the days “befo’ de wah. Eventually, she’d be boycotted by the NAACP, attacked by Langston Hughes, and belittled by Public Enemy. But this quintessential “mammy”—a black woman who lives to nurture, clean, and cook for whites—was a marketing phenomenon from the start, mythologized in ads painted by N.C. Wyeth and impersonated by actors who toured around the country. One had a permanent residency at “Aunt Jemima’s Pancake House” in Disneyland.


Hook, Line and Sinker
April 21, 2007, 3:48 am
Filed under: culture, media, politics

and-never-the-twain-shall-meet.jpg

Fire up the Tivo, or just be home on Wednesday, April 25th at 9:00pm to catch a devastating expose by Bill Moyers of the US media during the run-up to the Iraq war.

The program is called Buying The War. Here’s the link to PBS - check your local listings!

Greg Mitchell at Editor & Publisher has a great preview of Moyer’s main allegations here.

It is now clear to almost everyone – not just those who opposed the war from the start – that the US media performed almost no independent, responsible reporting in the months leading up to the start of the war in march 2003. Print and TV reporters offered virtually no images of killed or wounded civilians, asked no hard question of the war’s most avid proponents, and ignored evidence that could undermine the case for WMDs.

A snippet:

“[former CNN head] Walter Isaacson is pushed hard by Moyers and finally admits, “We didn’t question our sources enough.” But why? Isaacson notes there was “almost a patriotism police” after 9/11 and when the network showed civilian casualties it would get phone calls from advertisers and the administration and “big people in corporations were calling up and saying, ‘You’re being anti-American here.’”

Moyers then mentions that Isaacson had sent a memo to staff, leaked to the Washington Post, in which he declared, “It seems perverse to focus too much on the casualties or hardship in Afghanistan” and ordered them to balance any such images with reminders of 9/11. Moyers also asserts that editors at the Panama City (Fla.) News-Herald received an order from above, “Do not use photos on Page 1A showing civilian casualties. Our sister paper has done so and received hundreds and hundreds of threatening emails.”

There’s much more in the article, and the show sounds like it will make for eye-opening, if painful, viewing.

It’d all be criminal if it wasn’t so sad. And vice versa.



A Loss for Women’s Freedom and Safety
April 19, 2007, 3:07 am
Filed under: politics

Today five men on The Supreme Court – none of whom are physicians – upheld a ban on late-term abortions.  This procedure, deemed medically necessary in certain cases by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, is now illegal.

We should be clear here: Some women will suffer terrible physical and emotional harm because of this decision.  Others will die.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg wrote the dissent:

“Today’s decision is alarming,” Ginsburg wrote for the minority. “It tolerates, indeed applauds, federal intervention to ban nationwide a procedure found necessary and proper in certain cases by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists….And, for the first time since Roe, the Court blesses a prohibition with no exception safeguarding a woman’s health.”

She added: “Retreating from prior rulings that abortion restrictions cannot be imposed absent an exception safeguarding a woman’s health, the Court upholds an Act that surely would not survive under the close scrutiny that previously attended state-decreed limitations on a woman’s reproductive choices.”

The NT Times editorial page made a separate, equally important point:

Justice Kennedy actually reasoned that banning the procedure was good for women in that it would protect them from a procedure they might not fully understand in advance and would probably come to regret. This way of thinking, that women are flighty creatures who must be protected by men, reflects notions of a woman’s place in the family and under the Constitution that have long been discredited, said a powerful dissenting opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, joined by Justices John Paul Stevens, David Souter and Stephen Breyer.



Two Must-Reads!
April 1, 2007, 2:37 am
Filed under: culture, politics

I’ve been away from the blog for a little while, but here’s a bunch of things that will prove worth waiting for.

This NYTimes article by Alina Tugend about ‘crazy-busyness’ offers a handy list of reasons we over-schedule every second of our lives:

According to Dr. Hallowell, there are many (26 in his book) overlapping reasons we all fall into the trap of being overly busy. A few are:

¶It is so easy with cellphones and BlackBerrys a touch away.

¶It is a kind of high.

¶It is a status symbol.

¶We’re afraid we’ll be left out if we slow down.

¶We avoid dealing with life’s really big issues — death, global warming, AIDS, terrorism — by running from task to task.

¶We do not know how not to be busy.

Not only are we constantly occupied, but we, as Americans, are also famous for not knowing how to be unoccupied.

My husband and I would no more fail to use up vacation time than we would hand back our paycheck. But, according to a 2005 study, “Overwork in America,” released by the nonprofit group Families and Work Institute, 36 percent of 1,000 salaried employees surveyed by telephone said they did not plan to take their full vacation.

And on a different topic, we see that David Hicks, the Australian Gitmo detainee who had accused his American captors of torture, will be handed over to Australia officials as part of a plea deal. The deal requires him to agree to some strange conditions:

From the NT  Times:

The sentencing followed a day of proceedings in the first case under a 2006 law that authorized military commissions to try some detainees designated as enemy combatants. Those proceedings included Mr. Hicks’s amplifying on his guilty plea, acknowledging that prosecutors had the evidence to prove that he had been a trainee of Al Qaeda who, armed with an AK-47, was prepared to fight Americans in the Afghanistan conflict of 2001.

During the hearing, the military judge disclosed an extraordinary series of concessions Mr. Hicks had made to his American captors in negotiations for the plea deal, in which he admitted material support to a terrorist organization.

The deal included a statement by Mr. Hicks that he “has never been illegally treated” while a captive, despite claims of beatings he had made in the past. It also included a promise not to pursue suits over the treatment he received while in detention and “not to communicate in any way with the media” for a year.

Critics said those requirements were a continuation of what they say has been a pattern of illegal detention policies. “It is a modern cutting out of his tongue,” said Michael Ratner, president of the Center for Constitutional Rights, a legal advocacy group, based in New York, that is coordinating the representation of detainees in many suits challenging Guantánamo detention

David Kurtz at Talking Points Memo sums it up nicely:

What we have here is a plea bargain in which the government leverages its vast control over the life, liberty, and body of the defendant to obtain for itself a release from potential liability for its own conduct and a one-year protection from bad PR. Truth, justice, and the Gitmo way.